• XNX@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    13 hours ago

    zero screenshots on the announcement page and zero screenshots on the homepage. Exactly what i expect from gimp lol

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The UI looks the same lol

      The layers are the big thing, but its hard to show because the final result looks the same anyways

      • XNX@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Aw man i was hoping for a big ui upgrade like when blender released version 2.8 that now even cinema4d is copying.

        I fear gimp truly doesnt care about its ui/ux because technically everything you want to do is possible as long as you learn the ways ans they dont care to attract an audience thats not die hard FOSS people. For example schools havent been able to use it because theyre so deadset on their nsfw name and schools cant have kids googling gimp

        • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I fear gimp truly doesnt care about its ui/ux

          Why, because its been the single most requested change by the GIMP community for 20+ years and its the one thing they refuse to address?? Dont be silly, its not like the devs are acting like the guy who makes Filezilla who has been steadfastly refusing to implement a ‘dark’ feature simply because he does think anyone wants it… oh wait

        • RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          No self-respecting UI designer would ever want to work on that dinosaur of a codebase. The GIMP team is simply unable to do what Blender did, even if they made the UI their number one priority.

          • mholiv@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I mean the whole point of doing the mega rewrite to gtk3 was specifically to enable such forward looking progress.

            What they did in the 3.0 release was, largely, a massive modernization of a dinosaur code base.

            Now that it’s done it makes sense to do a UI overhaul. Before 3.0 it made no sense to even try, now it does.

            • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              58 minutes ago

              Why not? Krita did it, they made an entirely new interface (hell they did it over 10 years ago) so why does the GIMP teams refuse to do the same?

        • _____@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          they could have just called gims or gum

          naming stuff is important