There came to be an alternate term of ‘volcel’ for that, at least to the extent that you recognize that your situation isn’t conducive to a relationship even if the causes are not really voluntary. It never really caught on in popular use though.
I’m sure there’s something at the state level, found a local ref here. Seems to be one of those laws where it’s illegal if they already wanted a reason to mess with the driver.
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/aitkin/latest/aitkin_mn/0-0-0-802
I first heard of it with the 4chan R9K board, but I guess it goes back even further than that. I suppose it’s quite possible that by the time 4chan got a hold of the term that was at least the beginning of it becoming poisoned, or it may have already been taken over by that point.
Around here they refer to it as ‘unreasonable acceleration’.
Incel is such an oddly self reinforcing thing. As I recall it the term started as a self identification (I can’t get laid, there for am an involuntary-celibate), which ended up with these self ID people declaring someone else is at fault for their situation, then that attitude got so pervasive it became a given term (you can’t get laid BECAUSE you’re an incel).
Morphing of language and all, similar happened with ‘woke’. Either way, if these folks could comprehend a simple fact that the one person you can demand change of is yourself then maybe they could get out of that cycle.
It’s right in there with the clause where all the 2A fans claiming defence against out of control gov lay down and kiss ass if it’s only against ‘those’ people.
How do critters like this even sustain their bodies? Are their blood and nervous systems transparent too?